Given how Starlink has control of the whole stack, it's amazing they're not deploying DNS64/NAT64 using 464XLAT. Plenty of mobile carriers in Europe have been using this as a huge legacy address space saver.


I take Starlink being all IPv4 CGNAT as validating my minimal viable product reasoning.


Sign in to participate in the conversation

This instance is sponsored by FAELIX, an ISP with an ethical charter. We acknowledge that freedom of speech is a right, and we help those whose voice needs to be heard. However, all rights come with responsibilities; and we stand against prejudice and hatred. The moderators will intervene to ensure that all users of this instance have the right not to tolerate the intolerant.